Friday, January 17, 2014

Dustin Ackley Annotated Stats Analysis Page


Dustin Ackley Annotated Four-Stage Drill-Down Stats Analysis


Ratio Analysis


Why these stats?  To determine the pattern-template where the hitter fits.


  • The interplay of these five ratios helps identify the “type” of hitter.
  • Each of the five major plate outcomes is measured as a percentage of plate appearances.
  • Ted Williams: good at everything.  Note how only very accomplished hitters (Williams; Edgar Martinez) produce both above-average extra-base hits (XBH) and above-average singles.
  • The “modern slugger” strikes out a bunch but slugs and walks (Reggie Jackson prototype).
  • The “plate skills technician” owns the plate, but doesn’t hit the ball hard very often; relying more on singles (Rod Carew prototype).
  • The “random moon-shot guy” whose only real value is a high HR-rate (Miguel Olivo).
  • And the “pretty much average” guy (David Bell; though Bell was good at avoiding strikeouts, adding to his value).
  • The “+” columns set the 10-year MLB average at 100, and are not park-adjusted.




HR%
K%
BB%
XBH%
S%

HR%+
K%+
BB%+
XBH%+
S%+
10-year MLB average
2.7%
18%
8.4%
7.8%
15.5%






The Ultimate











Ted Williams
5.3%
7.2%
20.7%
11.4%
15.7%

199
160
247
146
101
Modern Slugger











Reggie Jackson
4.9%
22.7%
12%
9.4%
13.2%

184
74
143
120
85
Plate Skills Technician











Rod Carew
0.9%
9.7%
9.7%
6.2%
22.8%

34
146
116
79
147
Roid Rage











Mark McGwire 92-99
9%
21.2%
19.6%
12.5%
9.7%

338
82
234
160
63












Mariner Benchmarks











Ken Griffey Jr.
5.6%
15.7%
11.6%
10.5%
14.1%

211
113
138
134
91
Edgar Martinez
3.6%
13.9%
14.8%
9.7%
16.2%

135
123
177
124
105
Ichiro
1.2%
9.4%
5.9%
5.6%
24.0%

45
148
70
72
155
Raul Ibanez
3.8%
16.4%
8.5%
9.6%
15.4%

143
109
101
123
99
David Bell
2.3%
12.8%
8%
7.6%
15.5%

86
129
95
97
100
Miguel Olivo
3.7%
26.4%
4%
8.7%
13.9%

139
53
48
111
90
Willie Bloomquist
0.6%
15.4%
6.3%
4.9%
20.1%

23
114
75
63
129


Dustin Ackley -- above 10-year MLB average shaded


HR%
K%
BB%
XBH%
S%

HR%+
K%+
BB%+
XBH%+
S%+
2010 minors
1.19%
13.46%
12.78%
8.18%
14.65%

44
125
152
105
95
2011 minors
2.72%
11.48%
16.62%
8.76%
16.01%

101
136
198
112
103
2011 MLB
1.60%
21.01%
10.64%
7.71%
16.49%

59
83
127
99
106
2012 MLB
1.80%
18.56%
8.83%
5.39%
15.12%

67
97
105
69
98
2013 pre-demotion
0.58%
18.13%
7.02%
2.92%
15.79%

22
99
84
37
102
2013 minors
1.59%
11.11%
15.08%
7.94%
22.22%

59
138
180
102
143
2013 post-demotion
1.17%
16.02%
9.77%
7.42%
17.97%

43
111
116
95
116




Overall “Plate Value” Analysis


Why these stats?  To give a rough evaluation of overall value, taking strikeouts into account.


  • Generally, I dislike “one number” stats that try to “put everything” into one stat.  But I invented one of my own anyway as a “quick overview” (as opposed to be-all, end-all).  I call it Plate Value Index.  I like it better than the alternatives because it takes into account the negative value of strikeouts, and also identifies [negatively] hitters dependent on high BABIP (batting average on balls in play) for success.
  • “Non-single OBP” is OBP with singles excluded.  ISO is SLG with singles excluded.  So “non-single OPS” is NSOBP + ISO, or the value of offense from XBH + BB.
  • I then subtract K-rate (K/PA) to get PVI.
  • The 10-year PVI average is .147.  So PVI+ re-scales the PVI with .147 = 100.
  • This stat allows a rough-and-ready means to compare hitters of different types.  Junior and Edgar = both good.  Olivo and Bloomquist = both bad.
  • One type of hitter that does not fare well on this measure is the hitter dependent on singles (Carew, Ichiro).  Those hitters are dependent on maintaining high BABIP, which, in fact, Carew and Ichiro did. But not everyone will.
  • Once again, the “+” columns are based on the 10-year MLB average, and are not park-adjusted.





NSOBP
ISO
NSOPS
PVI

NSOBP+
ISO+
NSOPS+
PVI+
10-year MLB average
0.174
0.153
0.326
0.147





The Ultimate









Ted Williams
0.325
0.29
0.615
0.543

187
190
189
369
Modern Slugger









Reggie Jackson
0.224
0.228
0.452
0.224

129
149
139
153
Plate Skills Technician









Rod Carew
0.165
0.101
0.266
0.169

95
66
82
115
Roid Rage









Mark McGwire 92-99
0.333
0.39
0.723
0.511

191
255
222
348










Mariner Benchmarks









Ken Griffey Jr.
0.229
0.254
0.483
0.326

132
166
148
222
Edgar Martinez
0.256
0.203
0.459
0.320

147
133
141
218
Ichiro
0.121
0.095
0.216
0.122

70
62
66
83
Raul Ibanez
0.184
0.195
0.379
0.215

106
127
116
146
David Bell
0.166
0.139
0.305
0.177

95
91
93
120
Miguel Olivo
0.136
0.176
0.312
0.048

78
115
96
32
Willie Bloomquist
0.119
0.075
0.194
0.041

69
49
60
28


Dustin Ackley -- above 10-year MLB average shaded


NSOBP
ISO
NSOPS
PVI

NSOBP+
ISO+
NSOPS+
PVI+
2010 minors
0.221
0.140
0.361
0.227

127
92
111
154
2011 minors
0.261
0.184
0.445
0.330

150
120
136
225
2011 MLB
0.183
0.144
0.327
0.117

105
94
100
80
2012 MLB
0.143
0.102
0.245
0.059

82
67
75
40
2013 pre-demotion
0.108
0.045
0.153
-0.028

62
29
47
-19
2013 minors
0.250
0.135
0.385
0.274

144
88
118
186
2013 post-demotion
0.174
0.119
0.293
0.133

100
78
90
91



Plate Skills (On-Base) Analysis


Why these stats?  To assess ability to reach base and avoid outs.


  • The two main parts of the game are “getting on base” (avoiding outs) and “producing offense” (leading to runs), which combine into the “OBP” and “SLG” parts of OPS.
  • For this first part, I look at OBP and non-singles OBP (from XBH + BB).
  • I also invented a stat I call “Plate Skills Advantage,” which is an arbitrary number where zero indicates an OBP roughly equal to BABIP.  A hitter makes his OBP higher than BABIP by walking and by hitting the ball hard or over the fence; lower, by striking out instead of putting the ball in play.  In this measure, a walk and a HR are worth the same (+.702), because they both result in a plate appearance with an “OBP” of 1.000 (thus a “+” over 10-year average BABIP [which is .298] of .702).  A strikeout is -.298 since it drops the “OBP” of that plate appearance from .298 to .000.
  • Finally, it is important to determine a hitter’s “normal” BABIP.  Although a lot of variation is BABIP is random, each hitter, I believe, has a “center of gravity” for BABIP.  Although it helps to be a left-handed hitter with speed (Ichiro), it also helps to consistently hit the ball hard (Edgar Martinez, Ted Williams).
  • Once again, the “+” columns are based on the 10-year MLB average, and are not park-adjusted.





OBP
NSOBP
PSA
BABIP

OBP+
NSOBP+
BABIP+
10-year MLB average
0.329
0.174
0
0.298




The Ultimate








Ted Williams
0.482
0.325
+13.9
0.328

147
187
110
Modern Slugger








Reggie Jackson
0.356
0.224
+2.6
0.298

108
129
100
Plate Skills Technician








Rod Carew
0.393
0.165
+2.1
0.359

119
95
120
Roid Rage








Mark McGwire 92-99
0.430
0.333
+11.0
0.270

131
191
91









Mariner Benchmarks








Ken Griffey Jr.
0.370
0.229
+4.9
0.287

112
132
96
Edgar Martinez
0.418
0.256
+6.6
0.335

127
147
112
Ichiro
0.361
0.121
-0.4
0.344

110
70
115
Raul Ibanez
0.338
0.184
+1.5
0.298

103
106
100
David Bell
0.320
0.166
+1.0
0.274

97
95
92
Miguel Olivo
0.275
0.136
-4.9
0.294

84
78
99
Willie Bloomquist
0.320
0.119
-2.4
0.319

97
68
107


Dustin Ackley -- above 10-year MLB average shaded


OBPNSOBPPSABABIP
OBP+NSOBP+BABIP+
2010 minors0.3680.2213.820.303
112127102
2011 minors0.4210.2617.960.324
128150109
2011 MLB0.3480.1830.160.339
106105114
2012 MLB0.2940.143-0.800.265
898289
2013 pre-demotion0.2660.108-3.080.25
816284
2013 minors0.4720.2506.270.409
143144137
2013 post-demotion0.3540.1740.760.335
108100112




Plate Production (Slugging) Analysis


Why these stats? To assess ability to produce offense, and, therefore, runs.


  • The second half of the offensive analysis is “production.”
  • SLG and ISO (SLG - BA) are generally well-known.
  • HR/FB (HR per fly ball) is similar to BABIP in that it is subject to fluctuation, but each hitter has a “natural” gravitation point.  The difference between Miguel Olivo’s 11.6% and Willie Bloomquist’s 1.7% is not random.
  • I also invented a “summary” stat for production, which I have named “.900 Conversion Rate.”  I explained this concept in depth in a post called the “Allegory of the Window.”  The idea is to assess how “plausible” it is for a hitter to be a strong offensive contributor.  It is a measure of how many “regular” (sometimes I say “random-y”) balls in play a hitter needs to “convert” into singles in order to reach a .900 OPS, once his actual HR, non-HR XBH, walks and strikeouts are taken into account.  The lower the “conversion rate,” the more “plausible” it is for a hitter to be a contributor.  [You will note, however, that some hitters, like Carew and Ichiro, can reach “implausible” numbers of singles.  Most can’t.]
  • Once again, the “+” columns are based on the 10-year MLB average, and are not park-adjusted.



SLG
ISO
HR/FB
900Conv

SLG+
ISO+
HR/FB+
Conv+
10-year MLB average
0.414
0.153
7.70%
0.370





The Ultimate









Ted Williams
0.634
0.29

0.106

153
190

171
Modern Slugger









Reggie Jackson
0.49
0.228

0.298

118
149

120
Plate Skills Technician









Rod Carew
0.429
0.101

0.370

104
66

100
Roid Rage









Mark McGwire 92-99
0.674
0.39
25.8%
0.028

163
255
335
192










Mariner Benchmarks









Ken Griffey Jr.
0.538
0.254
14.6%
0.233

130
166
190
137
Edgar Martinez
0.515
0.203
9.8%
0.255

124
133
127
131
Ichiro
0.414
0.095
3.7%
0.390

100
62
48
95
Raul Ibanez
0.471
0.195
9.9%
0.309

114
127
129
117
David Bell
0.396
0.139
5.7%
0.355

96
91
74
104
Miguel Olivo
0.417
0.176
11.6%
0.413

101
115
151
88
Willie Bloomquist
0.346
0.075
1.7%
0.442

84
49
22
81


Dustin Ackley -- above 10-year MLB average shaded


SLG
ISO
HR/FB
900Conv

SLG+
ISO+
HR/FB+
Conv+
2010 minors
0.407
0.140

0.329

98
92

111
2011 minors
0.487
0.184

0.259

118
120

130
2011 MLB
0.417
0.144
4.5%
0.381

101
94
58
97
2012 MLB
0.328
0.102
5.5%
0.424

79
67
71
85
2013 pre-demotion
0.250
0.045

0.492

60
29

67
2013 minors
0.500
0.135

0.313

121
88

115
2013 post-demotion
0.404
0.119

0.378

98
78

98


Bottom line:

Notice how Ackley has yet to get any shaded boxes in the "slugging" category in the major leagues.  Minors, yes.  Majors, no.

Maybe that kind of production will come later (there's room for upside), but, for now, Ackley's value will come from singles and walks.  That's not a bad thing; it's just as good a thing as we were hoping for.